And he appears completely honest in regards to the meat of his argument. Amidst the large range of blockchain concepts, he writes, the Bitcoin group’s dedication to warning and willingness to defend Bitcoin with actual ferocity are significantly useful. As he particulars with examples like Ethereum miners frontrunning customers and development-funding tax proposals, the feature-richness of programs like Ethereum comes with inherent dangers to predictability and sturdiness. In the end, the massive danger is that some advanced function will threaten or undermine the decentralization of a system and make it susceptible to hostile assault. Maximalism can also be a useful protection, he argues, as extra money comes into the house, incentivizing short-term returns based mostly on “improvements” that may undermine cryptocurrency’s core premise.
Learn full article on Coin Desk
